Wednesday, March 3, 2021

Exclusionary rule narrowed in 4th Amendment case


In the Supreme Court of the United States, it was decided today that evidence obtained in a search was still valid, despite the undisputed fact that a clerical error on the part of the police led to the erroneous belief on the part of police that they had probable cause to conduct the search from which the evidence was seized.

The decision went 5-4, with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr writing for the majority, “When police mistakes leading to an unlawful search are the result of isolated negligence attenuated from the search, rather than systemic error or reckless disregard of constitutional requirements, the exclusionary rule does not apply.”

Paul Katula
Paul Katula is the executive editor of the Voxitatis Research Foundation, which publishes this blog. For more information, see the About page.

Recent Posts

Md. to administer tests in math, English

Students in Md. will still have to take standardized tests this spring in math and English language arts, following action of the state board.

A week of historic cold and snow

Perseverance lands on Mars

Summer vacation, summer job, or summer school?

Biden is sworn in as 46th president

Florida balances optimism after the riots