Site icon Voxitatis Blog

Student conductors in Kan. master the “holistic view”

Putting a baton in a student’s hand is more than just a “neat” classroom activity; it’s a high-stakes pedagogical tool that shifts a musician from passive participation to active leadership.

Brayden Smith noted, conducting forces a “holistic view,” Kennedi Fischer reported in the student newspaper at Hays High School in Kansas. Mr Smith is the orchestra director at the school, which hosted a concert last month at which students conducted every work.

But research suggests the benefits of conducting an orchestra go even deeper for students — into the realms of cognitive neuroplasticity, self-efficacy, and the development of a “growth mindset.”

In a traditional ensemble, students are responsible for their own notes and rhythm, and their focus is generally “linear.” However, a study published in Frontiers in Psychology (2024) indicates that active music-making, and specifically the sensorimotor integration required for conducting, engages the brain’s prefrontal cortex and parietal regions more intensely than passive listening or single-instrument play.

By conducting, students must process multiple “inputs” (the strings, the winds, the percussion) and synthesize them into a single “output” (the gesture). This builds critical thinking and self-awareness, as they have to instantly diagnose why a section is dragging or out of tune and fix it with a physical movement.

Growth Mindset on the Podium

The concept of a “growth mindset,” popularized by Carol Dweck, is perfectly embodied in works such as “Dance of Iscariot” or “Fantasy on a Japanese Folk Song.” These works, which appeared in the Hays program, are often categorized as “Grade 4” or “Grade 5” repertoire, meaning they contain complex rhythmic shifts and transparent textures where any error is exposed.

For a student like junior Issac Bloom or sophomore Leah Thomas, standing on the podium represents a massive “risk-taking” opportunity. Research from the National Association for Music Education (NAfME) suggests that when students take on these roles, they move from a “fixed” mindset, believing their leadership is a static trait, to a “growth” mindset, realizing that expressivity and cueing are skills that can be mastered through repetition and feedback.

The Benefits of “The Student Baton”

Research Area Key Benefit Impact on Student
Neuroplasticity Strengthens neural pathways between auditory and motor cortices. Improved coordination and multi-tasking abilities.
Social-Emotional Enhances “social relatedness” and empathy. The student must “feel” the ensemble’s energy to lead it effectively.
Pedagogical “Showing” vs. “Telling” builds clarity. Students learn that clear communication (gestures) produces immediate results.
Self-Efficacy Overcoming “Podium Anxiety.” Builds a “protective factor” for mental well-being and confidence.
To Help Students Become Better Conductors

To move from a “fixed” mindset of “I can’t lead” to a “growth” mindset of “I am a developing leader,” students need a structured way to observe and critique one another. Peer feedback in a music setting shifts the focus from personal criticism to behavioral observation, helping student conductors realize that their gestures are a form of nonverbal teaching.

Below is a research-based guide that student-musicians can use to provide high-quality feedback to their peers on the podium.

The Student Conductor’s Peer Feedback Guide

1. The Three Pillars of the “Podium Check”

When observing a peer conductor, focus your feedback on these three observable categories rather than general “good job” comments.

  • Pillar A: The Prep & The Breath

Did the conductor’s physical “breath” match the tempo and style of the piece? Was the “downbeat” clear and predictable for the ensemble?

  • Pillar B: Expressive Gesture

Did the conductor’s hand size change to show volume (dynamics)? Did their face reflect the “mood” of the music (for example, intense for Night Shift, serene for Mountain Hymn)?

  • Pillar C: Independence of Hands

Was one hand keeping the beat while the other provided “cues” or “phrasing” help? Did they maintain eye contact with the section they were cueing?

2. Using the “SBI” Model for Feedback

To ensure feedback is actionable and encourages a growth mindset, use the Situation-Behavior-Impact model:

  • S (Situation): “During the transition to the minor key…”
  • B (Behavior): “…your left hand stayed at your side instead of cueing the cellos.”
  • I (Impact): “…this made the cellos hesitate on their entrance.”

3. The “Growth Mindset” Peer Checklist

Give your peer a rating of 1–5 on these specific leadership traits:

  • Clarity: The beat was easy to follow, even during tempo changes.
  • Recovery: When a mistake happened, the conductor stayed calm and helped us find our place.
  • Communication: Used eye contact and facial expressions to “show” the music.
  • Presence: Stood tall and showed confidence, which helped the ensemble feel secure.

Why Peer Feedback Works

Research from the University of Colorado highlights that the person giving the feedback often learns as much as the person receiving it. By diagnosing a peer’s gesture, the observer internalizes the “holistic view” of the music that Mr Smith described. It builds metacognition, defined as the ability to think about one’s own thinking (and conducting).

Exit mobile version