Wednesday, September 30, 2020
US flag

Hackers breach an adultery website

Hackers broke into a website that invites married people to cheat on their spouses, exposing personal information about millions of users, the New York Times reports.

The owners of the website, Ashley Madison.com, issued a statement calling the actions of the hackers illegal. “It is an illegal action against the individual members … as well as any freethinking people who choose to engage in fully lawful online activities,” a statement from Avid Life Media said. “The criminal, or criminals, involved in this act have appointed themselves as the moral judge, juror, and executioner, seeing fit to impose a personal notion of virtue on all of society. We will not sit idly by and allow these thieves to force their personal ideology on citizens around the world.”

The hackers, though, say their theft and publication of users’ information had nothing to do with morality. Rather, they exposed the information to prove that data on the Internet is not secure, regardless of whether a company promises it is, according to a story on ABC News.

Voxitatis reported in October that there were four basic threats to the privacy of data stored online, including data about school records and possibly personally identifying information about minor students:

  1. criminals, such as in the Target or Home Depot breaches
  2. incompetent I/T staff, such as in the University of Maryland breach
  3. whistle blowers, as in Edward Snowden (see also #1)
  4. educators who don’t appreciate computer security, ubiquitously

For schools, unless and until these people are eliminated from the path of any student data, the public should never warm up to allowing companies to store students’ personal data, such as test scores or how well Johnny is learning fractions or what types of dolls Susie plays with, on their computer systems or in their data warehouses.

I’m not sure which group the Ashley Madison hack falls under—probably a combination of #1, #2, and #3. But as New York Times op-ed writer Jennifer Weiner points out, tongue-in-cheek, many of the people who signed up for Ashley Madison.com were too “stupid” or “lazy” to sign up for a fake email account from Gmail.com or some other email service provider before they divulged their personal information.

Although I don’t quite find the humor funny, it’s interesting that so many people still expect privacy from a website. In the presence of any of numbers 1 through 4 above, those promises aren’t worth the bits they’re written on. Given that the site is for cheaters, there’s a slight chance many of them wanted to get caught. They like to live dangerously, these people.

But still, fake emails can be traced by someone doing private investigatory work. I’m therefore pretty confident that the Ashley Madison.com victims—philanderers from a different perspective, but victims in the sense of privacy being invaded—were just too stupid to know privacy can’t be guaranteed so it shouldn’t be expected or too lazy to find an easy way to cover up their identity.

In that regard, they are no stupider or lazier than officials in our schools. They believe, in the face of powerful evidence to the contrary, that their privacy will somehow be protected if they use the Internet. They trust privacy policies that suggest their data won’t fall into criminal hands, won’t fall victim to incompetent I/T personnel, and won’t ever be exposed.

They believe these things about their own Internet activity despite having heard, no doubt, about several privacy breaches on systems that are much more guarded than the ones they’re using. They believe high-tech corporations care about their privacy, that good people are actually smarter than bad people, and that they are immune to the publication of their personal information when someone wants to prove a point.

Voxitatis has always maintained—and we are turning blue in the face—that Internet privacy cannot be guaranteed. The only way to make sure student data that is potentially sensitive won’t fall into the wrong hands is to not give it to anybody in the first place. And don’t even think about sending it to Facebook or to a school database maintained by for-profit corporations with shareholders who are, ultimately, more concerned about financial gain and keeping companies afloat than about your kid’s education or the quality of his school.

Paul Katula is the executive editor of the Voxitatis Research Foundation, which publishes this blog. For more information, see the About page.

Recent posts

Busy pictures hinder reading comprehension

When extraneous illustrations are used less, children can have an easier time focusing on text and better reading comprehension.

Student news roundup, Illinois, Sept. 28

Remote learning woes, BLM vs. ALM, inclusion and diversity, Halloween and fall, yearbook art, and a drive-in fall play.

Ideas on teaching ceramics remotely

Teaching ceramics during a pandemic that includes all-remote learning is a little different, and some art teachers rise to the challenge.

On constitutional flat taxes in Illinois

An important ballot question in IL involves the elimination of the flat tax in favor of a graduated income tax structure.

Weather conference for Howard Co. 6th graders

The Howard County (Md.) Conservancy invites 6th graders to register for a conference about preparing for extreme weather.

Exercise harder, remember more

Scientists have found that the more vigorously you exercise, the stronger the response in the brain that helps your memory.

More than Covid keeps kids home at E. Peoria

Mud & debris flooded E Peoria Comm HS this summer, so students can't return to in-person learning sooner than the end of Oct.

1/3 of an Okla. school returns to quarantine

After only a few days of in-person instruction, an Okla. high school experienced a rise in Covid cases and has resumed remote learning.

Schools rethink the whole idea of snow days

Why have snow days anymore if we can have 'virtual learning' days, now that we know a thing or two about how they work?

Student news roundup, Maryland, Sept. 24

State to allow sports beginning in Oct., but some districts won't go back yet; Miss Maryland Agriculture; music lessons virtually.

Grand jury indicts officer in Breonna Taylor case

A former police officer was indicted in connection with the death of Breonna Taylor in Louisville. But it was less than many had hoped for.

1 COMMENT

  1. A listing of suicide hotlines for most countries in the world is available here:
    suicide.org/international-suicide-hotlines.html

    We run this comment because there have been unconfirmed reports that people who have used the Ashley Madison website may become depressed and desperately try to kill themselves.

    In addition, a new scam, claiming to erase names from the Ashley Madison database in order to preserve users’ privacy, has sprung up, according to a report in The Guardian.

    “By clicking on these links, you are exposing your computer to adware, spyware, malware and viruses,” the news site quoted a security expert as saying. “Multiple sites have now downloaded [the Ashley Madison user database] and are present. Nobody is going to be able to erase that information. There are confirmed cases of people trying to extort Ashley Madison clients.”

Comments are closed.