Supreme Court: defendants don’t have ‘right’ to DNA testing

-

http://www.nytimes.com/learning/students/pop/articles/19scotus.html

The Supreme Court of the United States ruled on Thursday, 5-4, that defendants don’t have a right under the Constitution to test evidence against them for DNA matches that could serve to prove their innocence.

The ruling may not have a very wide effect, though, since most states have laws on the books that allow access to DNA tests for at least some defendants, for example, those who are willing to swear that they’re innocent.

Paul Katula
Paul Katulahttps://news.schoolsdo.org
Paul Katula is the executive editor of the Voxitatis Research Foundation, which publishes this blog. For more information, see the About page.

Recent Posts

Airwaves & amendments: Decoding FCC license threats

0
As the FCC warns broadcasters to 'correct course' on Iran war reporting, free speech advocates are sounding the alarm on a potential 1st-Amendment crisis.

The infinite evolution of π Day

Chocolate is shrinking and spiking