Sunday, December 8, 2019
US flag

Religious, political diversity is united at U.Va.

The Religious Studies Department at the University of Virginia issued an open letter about the events in Charlottesville a week ago, mentioning that, while the faculty of the department follow several different faith traditions and political leanings, they “stand united in our unanimous and unequivocal condemnation of those who promote hate, by way of violent speech and action—the white supremacists, the neo-Nazis, the neo-Fascists, the anti-Semites. And we regard this condemnation as the expression of a simple, moral truth rather than a political statement.”

The letter was reported in the Chronicle of Higher Education, which also noted the refusal on the part of three different universities following the violence in Charlottesville to grant permits for similar white supremacist marches: Texas A&M, the University of Florida, and just yesterday, Michigan State University.

Embed from Getty Images

Prominent white nationalist Richard Spencer was expected to speak at the Michigan State rally, and all three universities said, in refusing his permit, that they remained committed to protecting freedom of expression. Unfortunately, the violence in Virginia had changed how they have to balance that constitutional right against keeping their students, faculty, property, and the general public safe on their campuses.

Michigan State’s refusal was independently reported in the Lansing State Journal. “This decision was made due to significant concerns about public safety in the wake of the tragic violence in Charlottesville last weekend,” the university’s statement said. “While we remain firm in our commitment to freedom of expression, our first obligation is to the safety and security of our students and our community.”

At least we can agree on that! Students can’t learn and professors can’t teach properly with a threat of physical harm looming overhead. It’s not the “safe space” request we hear so often but one of actual physical harm that may come to students if white supremacists are allowed to bring their small army of torches and semiautomatic weapons to campus.

Making sense of the rise of populism


Some people compare the rise of Donald Trump with that of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi (Twitter).

Both President Donald Trump in 2016 and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2014 “had polarized voters in their respective countries along religious and ethnic lines,” wrote Nalini R Mohanty in First Post.com a few days after the US election. In the US, Mr Trump gained the vote of some white Christians sickened by threats from radicalized Muslim immigrants and of low-income whites sickened by jobs lost to illegal Mexican immigrants (neither of which are completely accurate), while Mr Modi won the votes of Hindus by making a pledge to end “pseudo-secularist” practices in India’s government (also not completely accurate).

In many respects, Mr Modi was a pioneer in right-wing nationalism who also garnered strong support from a religious community in his home country, wrote Sunny Hundal in The Independent about five months ago and less than two months into the Trump presidency:

Narendra Modi, like most populists, conducts politics as an act of constant war, not a matter of administration. He is hyperactive—constantly dreaming up new slogans and initiatives … But the primary weapon Modi deploys to polarize his audience and stun opponents is stoking up religious tension.

As the University of Virginia struggles to bring together different political viewpoints, as well as different religious faith traditions, races, socioeconomic statuses, backgrounds, cultures, and even versions of past events, we learn what makes America such a beacon of hope to the rest of the world.

It is, in fact, our many differences that make us that beacon. Take schools, for example: One of the contributing factors to the US being in the middle of the pack on international math or science benchmark tests is that we have such a diversity of kids in this country, with different opinions about not only science but education in general. It gets more complicated, though, when actual physical protection comes into the mix and we start waving guns and torches when we talk just for the sake of being able to talk.

But simple expression has never until now been the point of the First Amendment’s free speech clause. Free speech is about engaging in debate with people from different perspectives, about moving toward a consensus with respectful listening and talking from several different viewpoints. When one group brings a gun (and a car) to the debate, it’s not really a debate, so it’s not free speech.

Ne donnez pas un coup de pied à un cheval mort.

Yet one side in this debate shuts down the debate by brandishing weapons. That is not—repeat, not—free speech; it is terrorism. My ultimate view on the white supremacists’ message is that we have heard it, this great nation has raised up arms to defeat it, losing hundreds of thousands of lives in the process, and with that action and those words, we have come to the consensus that white supremacy isn’t what we want this country to be. Continuing to beat this dead horse doesn’t change what we have spoken as a nation.

Paul Katula is the executive editor of the Voxitatis Research Foundation, which publishes this blog. For more information, see the About page.

Recent posts

Girls’ volleyball champs in Illinois

We congratulate the Illinois state champions in girls' volleyball: Newark, St Teresa, Sterling, & Benet Academy.

A weekend of ‘band geeks’ across America

The musical Band Geeks was in performance at a MD high school, just as marching bands from across America named a national champion.

2 dead, 3 wounded in Calif. school shooting

Another school shooting has resulted in the death of 2 California high school students. The suspect shot himself and is in custody.

Mercury makes a transit; next in 2032

A transit of Mercury occurred today and was visible from the US, provided you had sunny skies. It was one of longest possible transits.

On the Naperville BWW racist incident

A racist incident at a Naperville, IL, sports bar indicates that the threads of racism are strong, perhaps as strong as ever.

IL bill could excuse absences to vote

A proposed law in IL could give students up to two hours during the school day so they could vote in the upcoming election.

Loan forgiveness gains some bipartisan support

One Republican from GA, who used to work under Betsy DeVos at the US Education Dept, offers a plan to forgive some student loan debt.

A band teacher is IL Teacher of the Year

IL named a band teacher the 2020 Teacher of the Year on Oct. 19. He individualizes music instruction and shares his work with 1000s.

‘Little Shop of Horrors’ bookends Halloween

Several high schools have decided to add a little spook to their musical stages in this season of Halloween. Music makes it happen.

New IL law ensures inclusion of LGBTQ+

A law will take effect next school year in IL that will require students to study LGBTQ history as part of the social studies curriculum.

MoCo doubles down on summer learning loss

Research is at least equivocal about summer learning loss, but maybe there's something to a new plan in Montgomery County, Md.